Category Archives: Uncategorized

When Drunk Becomes Rape (Because Some Profs Say So) (Update)

That there’s an epidemic of rape and sexual assault on campus is a given, because the White House says so, as do the advocates to end this plague, despite the absence of evidence except their anecdotes.  Perhaps they’re right, but it’s hard to say because the meaning of words used to describe offending conduct have become untethered from any definition.

Not to let lack of definitions or proof of a problem get in the way, the government is forcing the issue by ramming guidelines down the throats of colleges and universities to cure the problem that may or may not exist.  Colleges don’t appear to be resisting. And these changes in the view of sexual assault and rape appear to be filtering through to criminal law.

Two profs, Kathleen Bogle, teaching sociology and criminal justice (whatever that is) at LaSalle, and Anne Coughlin, a lawprof at UVA, apparently recognized the confusion wrought by an excess of passion and a dearth of reason and decided to fix the problem.  Their post at Slate is entitled The Missing Key to Fighting Sexual Assault on Campus, with the subtitle, Universities must make clear when having sex with a drunk person is a crime.  Continue reading →

Nor Feelings of Machismo

Much as fragile feelings may be given what’s considered by some to be short shrift here, the similarly strongly held feelings of the most manly men are no better. Via Clark at Popehat:

A Blair County man said he was standing up for this American Indian heritage and expressing his beliefs when he hung an American flag upside down and spray painted it earlier this week…

“I was offended by it…” said Allegheny Township police Assistant Chief L.J. Berg. Berg said he took the flag down and charged Joshua Brubaker with desecration and insults to the American flag. “I removed it from the building, folded it properly and seized it as evidence,” said Berg…

And, of course, Assistant Police Chief Berg, in touch with his deep feelings of offensiveness, “charged Joshua Brubaker with desecration and insults to the American flag.”  Because, feelings. Continue reading →

Trigger Warning: Special Little Snowflake Ahead (Update)

It begins with a traumatic experience. The problem is that traumatic experiences, like every other feeling suffered by those who believe their sensitivities define the parameters of everyone else’s world, is a humpty dumpty phrase.  That’s a burden no one can meet, despite the most sincere words of UC Santa Barbara student Baily Loverin.

The demand is for “trigger warnings,” which is explained by the New York Times:

Should students about to read “The Great Gatsby” be forewarned about “a variety of scenes that reference gory, abusive and misogynistic violence,” as one Rutgers student proposed? Would any book that addresses racism — like “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” or “Things Fall Apart” — have to be preceded by a note of caution? Do sexual images from Greek mythology need to come with a viewer-beware label? Continue reading →

Deputy Eric Vaughan’s Thing About A Woman’s Mouth

Siobhan Householder was told to wait in the room, so she did.  She was at the Summit County, Ohio, domestic relations court, waiting for a warrant to be vacated after missing a hearing, where she appeared of her own accord. No big deal, at first.

Sitting there with her purse, another bag and a plastic cup of soda, Householder took some Tylenol for a tooth infection while waiting.  All hell broke loose. Via Ohio.com:

After the deputy was there about two minutes, Householder said she took two Tylenol pills along with a sip of soda. She was taking a third when the deputy confronted her, she said.

“He said, ‘What are you taking?’ and I said, Tylenol,” she recalled. “And he said, ‘Spit it out’ and I said, ‘I can’t.’ I meant to say I can’t spit it out because I had already swallowed the other pills.

“But I didn’t even get that part out before he just yanked me up and threw me down on the ground and was trying to dig these pills out of mouth.

“And there was one [pill] in there and I couldn’t even get it out because he kept shoving his hand in my mouth and squeezing my face and pulling my hair at the same time.”

Wrestled to floor.

Continue reading →

Reason Number 7 To Send A Child To College

Following on the heels of reason number 8, to learn that old white men are mean, stupid and just don’t get it, comes reason number 7 via USA Today.

[A]ccording to a study published by the Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, nearly 70% of college students admit to having sent or received sexually suggestive text messages. Apps like Snapchat, make it easier than ever for students to share nude or partially nude images.

When one old white man went to college, students had sex. Lots of it. We also had cameras, but we didn’t necessarily take pictures of it.  I know, without pics, it didn’t happen, but that was a time where people had actual real life experiences, and had yet to realize they were supposed to share them with everyone they knew with visual proof. Continue reading →

Safer By The Numbers

In a letter to the editor at Newsday, a good question is asked about stop & frisk under new NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton as opposed to stop & frisk under old Commissioner Ray Kelly:

According to the Newsday article “Kudos go to Kelly” [News, May 10], New York City Police Commissioner Bill Bratton says he is comfortable with the number of stop-and-frisk stops now.

The numbers in the article, however, make me wonder whether the NYPD is heading in the right direction: 14,261 stops in the first three months of 2014 led to arrests or summonses in 20 percent of the cases. That compares with 99,788 stops that led to arrests or summonses 10 percent of the time in the same period in 2013.

That means under Commissioner Ray Kelly, there were 9,979 “good” stops, versus 2,852 for the same period this year. Aren’t we safer with more good stops?

Continue reading →

Like Client, Like Lawyer

Paul Alan Levy of Public Citizen fame is one of those lawyers I’ve long admired and, sometimes, envied. He gets to spend his days taking on good causes for no better reason than they’re good causes.  For those of us who need to earn a living, the romanticism of representing for no better reason than because it’s right is the stuff of dreams.  And thankfully, there are guys like Paul around to do what they do.

When Paul took on the cause of Jennifer Choi, who was sued by Phoenix auto repair shop ToyoMotors for being dissatisfied with them, he stood on high ground.

In mid-2009, Jennifer Choi posted a scathing Yelp review of a Phoenix repair shop called ToyoMotors, contending that her car was diagnosed as needing repairs that other shops assured her were unnecessary, and that its fees were excessive by comparison with its competitors.  Four years later, ToyoMotors went on the offensive.  It signed on with “Demand Force,” a digital marketing operation that elicits positive feedback from customers to spray around the Internet.  A look at ToyoMotors’ page on DemandForce reveals a feel-good version of Yelp, featuring a slew of positive reviews, the sort of web page we would see more often if the recent European Court of Justice decision, allowing people to purge the web of unfavorable information they would like to be forgotten, were to take hold in the United States.

Continue reading →

Mugshots: The Other #RevengePorn

Senator Joseph Robach (R-Rochester) has introduced a bill, S-7304, to make it unlawful to release the mugshot of a person unless and until the person is convicted.  From SYR.com:

Even if a person is acquitted, the mugshot can still circulate online for years. Some people argue a mugshot can change the outcome of a case.

“Viewing someone’s photograph after the fact, sometimes months after the fact, there’s a danger of them identifying in court the person whose photograph they saw instead of the person who actually committed the offense,” said attorney Donald Kelly with Tully Rinckey PLLC.

Innocent or guilty, once a photo hits the web, it can be saved by nearly anyone with access to a computer.

Continue reading →

The Forgotten 2,785

When Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the administration’s disgraceful handling of clemency would not define the president’s last few days in office, there was applause. Sure, a bit of cynical snarling about the disingenuousness of finding religion in a lame duck term, but still. Anything that helped people (and even Jim Cole admitted that sentences were unduly severe, despite his role in advocating for them in the well) was better than nothing, a cynical ploy though it might be.

But at HuffPo, Megan Quattlebaum pours some cold water on the joyous festivities by reminding us that there are 2,785 applications for clemency, people who have damn good reason to seek the mercy of the executive, that are growing moldy while the DoJ and White House are throwing themselves a party over how merciful they are, at least in the press.

Late last month, the Department of Justice announced a laudable initiative to seek out nonviolent drug offenders with long prison sentences whom it will consider for clemency. The initiative is open to federal prisoners who meet six criteria, including that they have served at least ten years of their sentence and likely would have received a substantially lower sentence if convicted of the same offense today. The goal, according to President Obama, is to help “restor[e] fundamental ideals of justice and fairness” to our penal system by releasing those who “would have already served their time and paid their debt to society” had they been sentenced under current law. Continue reading →

The Fallacy of Sentencing Deference (Update)

For those whose fond law school memories have yet to fade completely, you may still have some tiny recollection of admin law’s peculiar crutch called Chevron deference.  The notion is that if Congress hasn’t spoken directly to an issue, the courts will defer judgment to that of an administrative agency because they have magical voodoo powers.

It’s one of those legal fictions where the courts presume the agency to know how to administer its law because of its specialized knowledge, as opposed to its members being appointed because they shared a dorm room with a politician when both were back at Rosemary Hall.  It relieves a judge of the responsibility to think, to rule and to be responsible for his decision, by allowing the judge to shirk responsibility and shift the blame to the agency.

Such an animal exists within the federal criminal law sphere as well, called the United States Sentencing Guidelines Commission. No, it’s not quite a perfect analogue to an administrative agency, nor does anyone mention Chevron deference, but there is the same awed expectation of voodoo, the facile presumption of mad skilz, that allows judges to pass the buck. Continue reading →