In the definitional statute at 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(3), it states “The term ‘alien’ means any person not a citizen or national of the United States,” which would seem to suggest two things, that the statutory word “alien” is, well, the statutory word, and that replacing it with “non-citizen” isn’t too far a stretch. Then again, the definition is for application of the Title 8, Chapter 12, immigration and nationality, so there is a contextual overlay as well. But is it really an issue?
This opinion uses the term noncitizen unless quoting language from the immigration statutes or past opinions containing the term alien. There are two reasons behind this choice. First, use of the term noncitizen has become a common practice of the Supreme Court, see Patel v. Garland (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. Palomar-Santiago (2021) (Sotomayor, J.); Barton v. Barr (2020) (Kavanaugh, J.) (“This opinion uses the term ‘noncitizen’ as equivalent to the statutory term ‘alien.'”), whose lead on matters of style we ordinarily follow, and of the Board of Immigration Appeals, e.g., Matter of Dang (BIA 2022), whose decisions we review. Continue reading

