Rarely, by which I mean I can’t recall it ever happening before, has anyone been outraged at the New York State Board of Parole for releasing a prisoner. The reason is plain; the Parole Board has long considered its roll to be a SuperJudge, deciding that the sentence imposed, say, 20 years to life which means the sentencing judge determined that after 20 years imprisonment, the defendant should be eligible for parole release, wasn’t harsh enough.
But as Appellate Squawk notes, Diane Piagentini not only took issue with the determination of the parole board, those pinko commie crime-lovers, but brought an Article 78 proceeding (the NY statutory equivalent of a writ) to annul its decision to release Herman Bell on parole.
The occasion was a lawsuit filed by the widow of Police Officer Joseph Piagentini, who was ambushed and shot to death during the 1970’s enthusiasm for killing cops in the name of the Black Revolutionary Army. Herman Bell, a college student at the time, was convicted of murder and sentenced to 25 years to life. Now that he’s 70 years old and a changed man after serving 40 years in prison, he was finally released to parole.
