Since the first of the year, Mark Bennett has performed yeoman’s service to the blawgosphere and the law. He has given us the gift of a thorough, thoughtful and legally irrefutable explanation of why the anti-revenge porn laws fail to satisfy existing First Amendment law, and why advocates of such laws have deceived and misled in their efforts to convince otherwise.
This is a gift that Mark has given to the rest of us, no strings attached. While the advocates have either posted their positions on big league websites like Forbes or been quoted approvingly by others as an appeal to purported authority, being law professors such that anything they say about the law must be true, by those who support their cause, Mark’s gift is available for any journalist who wishes to accept it.
The gift is out there, free to anyone who wishes to be honest and accurate about the failures of these laws to comport with the First Amendment, the concept for which the people at Charlie Hebdo died. For a few minutes after that, many people took an interest in free speech, but that quickly changed to free speech provided it was speech they liked and valued. Continue reading
