The lawyer defending Canadian radio host Jian Ghomeshi did a heck of a job. So why is she catching all sorts of shit for her success?  Because she’s a she. A woman. A female. A traitor to her gender.

Marie Henein, the lawyer who successfully represented former CBC Radio host Jian Ghomeshi, is rejecting any accusations that she has betrayed women by taking on the high-­profile sexual assault case, insisting that justice was served in the trial.

Is she ashamed of having done her job, and done it exceptionally well? Are you kidding?

“I’m thrilled with the result,” said Henein in an exclusive interview with CBC’s chief correspondent Peter Mansbridge on The National.

“Obviously I think it is the correct result. It was a principled result in a case where people were agitating, I think perhaps not being as measured as we would like.”

Continue reading →

Since outrage is the flavor of the day, why not the public defenders in Miami?  And as David Ovalles at the Miami Herald shows, they’re plenty steamed.

A Miami Beach cop, worried about his words being twisted at trial, recently used his newly outfitted “body camera” to record a hallway interview by a defense attorney — without telling her first.

The resulting objection from the Miami-Dade Public Defender’s Office, it is safe to say, was strenuous.

Not to be trite, but they strenuously objected? About what?

The incident sparked outrage from the Public Defender’s office, which called the recording “a violation of Florida law” and re-ignited long-running complaints that defense attorneys in minor cases are generally not allowed formal interviews with witnesses before trial.

Continue reading →

Trigger Warning: This post gets into the weeds of interpretation. If you’re prone to headaches, do not read it. It will produce pain.

The City Journal is the organ of conservative think tank, the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. So when it publishes about the case for originalism, you know where it’s coming from.

The Constitution, we’re told by the progressive-minded, is a “living, breathing” document that allows for such updating in the modern age. On the other side, originalists and textualists argue that the Constitution’s meaning is stable, that its words retain the meaning they possessed when they were written. The dispute has spanned more than a generation, and, with the recent death of Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia and nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Court, has taken on tremendous political weight. 

Indeed, the dispute is back on the front burner with warring arguments over the meaning of “advice and consent,” and whether this is a Senate duty or a suggestion, if they feel like it. Continue reading →

In his New York Times column, David Brooks revisits a great Civil War story juxtaposing perceptions of masculinity that, no doubt uncoincidentally, involved a group that called itself the Independent Order of Trumps. You can’t make this stuff up.

In the middle of the Civil War a colonel named Robert McAllister from the 11th Regiment of New Jersey tried to improve the moral fiber of his men. A Presbyterian railroad contractor in private life, he lobbied and preached against profanity, drinking, prostitution and gambling. Some of the line officers in the regiment, from less genteel backgrounds, rebelled.

They formed an organization called the Independent Order of Trumps. In sort of a mischievous, laddie way, the Trumps championed boozing and whoring, cursing and card-playing.

It is, of course, a loaded story, since the Trumps were vulgar ruffians, while McAllister was a gentleman. Continue reading →

He works at Williams College, one of those tiny northeastern elitist liberal arts schools that suffers from the low self-esteem of having students who didn’t get into Harvard or Yale, despite their parents’ best efforts.  But Ferentz Lafargue committed his crime at the Washington Post.

In the work that I do as a diversity advocate in higher education, I hear often a concern that some of our efforts in pursuit of equity may be doing students a disservice — that we’re not preparing them for the “real world.”

The implied logic is that if students feel empowered to voice their discontent with microaggressions experienced on campus, then they’re not developing the thick skin necessary to deal with the slights they’ll see in the workplace, out in the “real world.”

Students should “toughen up,” and we should stop “coddling” them, we’re told.

Why he contends that the logic is implied is unclear. It would seem to be remarkably express, flagrant even.  But then, that’s because he used the word “microaggressions,” which foreshadows his next salvo. Continue reading →

The beauty of a documentary is that it conveys the message that it’s serious, it’s real, it’s legitimate.  That it also is crafted to convince its viewers that it reveals a secret truth that powerful forces are trying to conceal isn’t considered a flaw, but a feature.  After all, if these forces were being honest, then there would be no need for some independent film maker to speak truth to power.

Unless, of course, the “truth” was born of paranoia or an agenda, and the documentary was nothing more than propaganda.  Robert De Niro fell victim to this problem.  In selecting films to be viewed at the Tribeca Film Festival, De Niro’s pet project, he decided to include “Andrew Wakefield’s antivaccine propaganda- and conspiracy-laden quackfest of a documentary entitled Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe.”

What made De Niro decide to include this controversial film?

Grace and I have a child with autism and we believe it is critical that all of the issues surrounding the causes of autism be openly discussed and examined. In the 15 years since the Tribeca Film Festival was founded, I have never asked for a film to be screened or gotten involved in the programming. However this is very personal to me and my family and I want there to be a discussion, which is why we will be screening VAXXED. I am not personally endorsing the film, nor am I anti-vaccination; I am only providing the opportunity for a conversation around the issue.

Continue reading →

The call to the police was from Larry Faulkenberry’s teen-aged son. When did kids decide that the best response to a parent being a parent was the cops?  Likely after they figured out that there will always be adults who don’t share other parents’ choices. And children, realizing that they have a card to play, play it. That’s what Faulkenberry’s son did.

He conceded that the whole ordeal could have been avoided had his teen-aged son not called the police.

“He got in trouble at school. I explained to him he was grounded. He got upset. He told me he was going to call the police and tell them I was waving a gun at him and drunk. I sat down to cool off and 20 minutes later, I see flashlights coming up the driveway,” he said.

Of course, calling the police doesn’t mean that a child’s poor decision should be compounded by the cops.  Unfortunately,  Sgt. Dustin Yost, Deputy Michael Taylor and another officer identified only as Deputy Houseston, of the Caldwell County, Texas, Sheriff’s Department, decided to make Faulkenberry’s son’s childish foolishness look absolutely brilliant in comparison to their choices. Continue reading →

Heidi Czerwiec has shit for brains.  Sure, she’s an associate professor of English at the University of North Dakota, which pretty much means that she chose her undergraduate major poorly and, failing to find a societally useful job, became an academic.  Maybe that’s unfair, as it’s not like she does nothing beyond teaching.

My new collection, Self-Portrait as Bettie Page (Barefoot Muse, 2013), is a sonnet sequence that negotiates the relationship between formal poetics, bondage/discipline, and female identity through the figure of elusive 1950s pinup Bettie Page, whose own identity was a series of costumes.

But she’s a bit skittish, so when she saw people with guns outside her office window, she did what any blithering idiot concerned woman does: she called 911.

A professor at the University of North Dakota is pledging to repeatedly call the police on campus military cadets in protest against the school’s decision to let them hold drills on campus while carrying guns.

Continue reading →

It was, sadly, a remarkably unremarkable description of the perp.

At 3:21 a.m. on August 28, 2015, campus police were called to Porter Hall where a young woman had been groped in her sleep. The attacker fled and dropped cigarettes and a lighter.

“She was sleeping, and it was very difficult for her to make an identification,” attorney Paul Michalek said.

She said it was a short, black man in black shorts.

You can’t blame the young woman for being unable to provide a more detailed description. Awake, most people can’t describe another person well. Asleep, it was likely impossible. And assuming, as we should, that she was, indeed, groped (though it would be helpful if a less conclusory word was used), she certainly had good reason to call campus police.  This was a crime, and the perpetrator of the crime should be caught. Continue reading →

“It’s time,” she said.

“But, are you sure? Are you sure you want a new one?”

“It’s time.” SWMBO turned and walked away.  I dutifully headed down to the local appliance store, as I prefer to buy from small local businesses.  After being informed by the six people standing around the counter that I had to wait for Sam, who was on the phone, because he was the guy who knew stuff, I stood there for about ten minutes, until I realized that I wasn’t the first person in line for Sam. There was another guy also waiting for him, so I would be after the guy.

Much as I like buying locally, I’m not big on waiting. I’m especially not big on waiting when there are six people standing there not helping me. So I walked out, crossed the street and went down the block to the local hardware store.  One local merchant was as good as another. Continue reading →