I didn’t have much to do on February 13th, 2007. Dr. SJ, on the other hand, was busy, so to get me to stop annoying her, she told me, “start a blog.” So I did. It’s 15 years later and the blawg is still here, even though the blawgosphere has mostly come and gone in the meantime.

I’ve made a great many friends, and more than a few enemies. I’ve watched blogs come and go. I’ve seen Facebook, Twitter and podcasts replace actual thought as reflected in writings, and the need for validation replace the challenge of critical thought. Lawyers have been replaced by culture warriors, and reason has given way to emotion. And yet, here I am, still sitting down at the computer in the mornings typing out blawg posts about whatever strikes me as worth writing about. Continue reading →

As a professor and associate dean for faculty research at Tulane Law School, Ann Lipton brought some legit bona fides to her scholarship. Like all prawfs, her law review article, Capital Discrimination, was posted to SSRN, short for social science research network, and accepted for publication in the Houston Law Review. The article presented an interesting spin on business disputes when one party was male and the other female.

The law of business associations does not recognize gender.  The rights and responsibilities imposed by states on business owners, directors, and officers do not vary based on whether the actors are male or female, and there is no explicit recognition of the influence of gender in the doctrine.

Continue reading →

Some of the more progressive reformers on my radar throw out “wage theft” as the countervailing argument to shoplifting. Why, they argue, does petty theft garner national attention when wage theft, which involves far greater amounts of money, gets almost no attention?

The answer seems fairly obvious, as one is discrete and has visuals, and we are very much a visual society moved by images, and the other is some amorphous claim, sometimes mischaracterized as theft when there is a reasonable dispute about what wages are due. Continue reading →

The Great Flip happened. It’s out there for all to see and it’s radiculopathy ridiculous. Rand Paul calling for a blockade of the Super Bowl while an old twit by AOC about how protests are meant to make people uncomfortable is making the rounds again.

Rand Paul calls on truckers to blockade the Super Bowl and DC: “I’m all for it. Civil disobedience .. is a time-honored tradition in our country from slavery to civil rights to you name it. Peaceful protest, clog things up, make people think about the mandates.” pic.twitter.com/zvCBTe9wkg

— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) February 12, 2022

Continue reading →

It’s time once again for a collection of musings, observations, opinions, and ramblings, all offered by a visually-impaired middle-aged crazy man on the Internet. As such, none of these should be taken seriously. Unless, of course, you agree with me.

I learned this week “Ogentroost” is the name of a Dutch metal band. It also sounds like some kind of obscure liver disease. Continue reading →

Three Harvard graduate students sued the University for its “deliberate indifference” to sexual harassment by a venerated anthropology professor, John Comaroff.

The suit, filed by three graduate students in the Anthropology Department, alleges that Harvard mishandled Title IX complaints and allowed Comaroff to intimidate students who threatened to report him, including the plaintiffs. Continue reading →

Some thought that poor Merrick Garland, former judge from whom a Supreme Court seat was stolen by the Republicans, would be the hero attorney general of their dreams. After all, he was Obama’s nominee and the maligned soul who launched a thousand SCOTUS tears.

But when it came time to decide whether prosecutors under his auspices were any more ethical, more reliable, more honest, Radley Balko discovered that the more things change, the more they stay the same. Continue reading →

The words were the same insipid appeal to emotion used by every manipulative tough-on-crime prosecutor ever.

To me, the trials underscore how ill-equipped the criminal legal system, process, and punishment is to achieve accountability and healing. Ahmaud Arbery’s killers were sentenced to life without the possibility of ever being released. Sentenced to death in prison. Yet still, his killers remain unrepentant and indignant. Meanwhile, even worse: Arbery’s family remains unwhole, unhealed, traumatized. Continue reading →

Not only were the facts undisputed, but they were appalling. Yet Miranda Smith did it anyway.

The Wednesday ruling came in the case of a Highland County woman charged with rape involving a two-year-old child. The Ohio Supreme Court reversed the decisions of an appeals court and trial court that convicted the woman of rape, saying instead, the actions, which she admitted to, constitute gross sexual imposition under state law. Gross sexual imposition is a lesser charge that could net less punishment. Continue reading →

“I feel like our job as a group of documentarians trying to cover this very delicate issue was to do what we’re always trying to do, which is tell the truth. Let’s hear everybody out. And then let’s let the audience decide for themselves what’s true and what’s not true or what’s right and what’s wrong.”—“Cheer” director Greg Whitely (emphasis mine)

It’s funny reading a comment like that from a documentary filmmaker. One of my problems with that genre, specifically in the realm of criminal justice issues, is the tendency to take nuanced issues and present them as unvarnished truth. When the director’s eye turns its gaze toward what makes a story pop for the camera, concepts like the presumption of innocence become evanescent. Continue reading →